I experienced a mix of emotions when I read the headline “Automakers Underspend on Media that Influence Buyers”. I think it was maybe a feeling of frustration that this seems to have been reported several times before, and yet nothing seems to change … relief that it is once in again in the spotlight … and then possibly the wry reflection that probably still nothing will change!

fuh2

It appears that “top automotive advertisers” spent by far the greatest percentage of their media dollars on TV in 2006 (surprise) which is an incredibly unbalanced media spend compared with influence on purchase (approximately 40% of spend vs. 17-18% of influence). The analysis comes amid reports of automakers’ reallocation of more dollars to digital advertising, but those moves “may not be going far enough…”

I have a few issues with the research … for example, what of the myriad other “connections” (if I can use the word without being sued) and influences outside advertising, that affect people’s decisions?

I was initially dubious of the AOC’s title this year “Why Don’t People Get It” … reading the above research I am starting to come round to the idea!

I thought it was a very smart move by Virgin America when I heard that they would be including blogs and podcasts in their InFlight entertainment system. In a Social Media masterstroke, they even let Boing Boing name one of their planes … they picked “Unicorn Chaser”.

Music blog/label RCRD LBL has a music channel, and Virgin America also has video podcasts from Boing Boing, Digg and TED which are updated monthly. The new airline also apparently hopes to have more daily blog content to sit alongside traditional media in the future. Thanks to Piers.

Virgin America Inflight 425